Search for: "Gill v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2010, 7:04 pm
" On the latter question, readers of the DoJ's Bishop brief will find that some of the arguments reprise those already made, and made again, in Gill v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court agreed to hear a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case from Wisconsin, Gill v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
In USA Today, Joan Biskupic previews the first: Henderson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
USA Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 08a0344n.06 Gill v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
USA Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville 08a0344n.06 Gill v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
At Yahoo News, Roger Parloff reports that the court’s decision whether to “wade into the inherently political quagmire of district mapping” in Gill v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am
High Court, Tansey v Gill [2012] IEHC 42[defamation, hosting provider, preliminary injunction, interlocutory order][The plaintiff claimed he had been defamed on the website www.rate-your-solicitor.com. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm
infiltrated his team and witnessed them using gill nets to catch American paddlefish. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
On Tuesday, the justices heard oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 8:18 am
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that a three-judge panel on Thursday chose not to enter a preliminary injunction declaring Maryland’s sixth congressional district an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander; the court put further proceedings on hold pending the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the court could announce today whether it will review a lower court decision holding that Wisconsin’s “redistricting plan violated the Constitution’s First Amendment and equal rights protections because of partisan gerrymandering”; he explains that the case, Gill v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and a partisan-gerrymandering case from North Carolina back for reconsideration in light of Gill v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
” At RealClear Politics, Matt Walter weighs in on Gill v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:19 am
” At ElectionLaw@Moritz, Edward Foley discusses Gill v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
Writing for The Washington Post’s Monkey Cage blog, Bernard Grofman parses last term’s partisan-gerrymandering decisions in Gill v. [read post]
